A client’s utilisation numbers jump 40% in a single quarter, and the HR director on the other end of the call sounds nervous, half-expecting you to confirm something has gone badly wrong on their floor. Here’s the uncomfortable truth: she might be right, or she might have just built the kind of workplace people actually feel safe enough to seek help from. A 2023 study by the Employee Assistance Professionals Association found that only 6-10% of employees typically make use of their EAP in a given year (EAPA, 2023), which means a spike isn’t inherently good or bad news. It’s a prompt to look harder, not a verdict.
a spike isn’t inherently good or bad news. It’s a prompt to look harder, not a verdict.

Reading the Spike as a Warning

There’s a version of high utilisation that absolutely deserves scrutiny. A sudden, sharp jump concentrated in a single department or under a specific manager often points to something structural, a toxic team dynamic, a restructuring badly handled, or a critical incident rippling through a workforce. In South African workplaces specifically, where stigma has long suppressed help-seeking, an unusually fast rise can also signal that something has broken the normal silence, and it’s worth asking what. The number alone won’t tell you which story you’re in; only the pattern behind it will.

where stigma has long suppressed help-seeking, an unusually fast rise can also signal that something has broken

Reading the Spike as a Trust Signal

But the same number can just as easily mean the opposite. If your organisation has been sitting well below that 6-10% benchmark for years, movement toward it is arguably a success story, it can mean stigma is finally softening, and that employees believe using the EAP won’t cost them anything professionally. Given that South Africa’s untreated mental health conditions already cost the economy an estimated R161 billion a year in lost productivity, absenteeism and presenteeism (SADAG, 2022), an EAP genuinely being used is doing exactly the early-intervention work it exists for, long before problems escalate into absenteeism or disability claims.

Let the Standard Do the Reading for You

This is exactly why EAPA-SA’s Standards formalise Evaluation as a distinct, non-negotiable pillar of programme design, not an optional add-on once the numbers look interesting (EAPA-SA, 2015). A raw utilisation figure means very little in isolation; it needs to be read against referral source, presenting issue and department-level context before anyone draws a conclusion from it.

A raw utilisation figure means very little in isolation; it needs to be read against referral source,

Don’t Just Report the Number – Interpret It

The practitioners who add real value aren’t the ones simply forwarding a quarterly percentage to HR. They’re the ones willing to sit with the number, ask what’s actually driving it, and bring that fuller picture back to leadership. EAPA-SA’s community of practice is where that interpretive skill keeps getting sharper.

References